Archive for category Practice Management System

Evaluating an EMR? Use the opportunity to assess your overarching technology solution

emr_selectionThe prospect of obtaining stimulus funding has, not surprisingly, created an environment of intense focus on EMRs.  While that’s OK, I see a distinct limitation in looking at EMRs, practice management systems (PMS) and other applications as isolated pieces of hardware/software. Instead, I think the current atmosphere provides many practices the opportunity to step into completely new systems, with a completely new way of viewing the components.

Rather than contemplating an EMR purchase or PMS evaluation in the context of “what’s available,” consider how well these technologies will serve as your platform from which to custom-build, taking into account future needs as well as current.

It is similar to when, as a teenager, I went to buy my first stereo system. I saved up, went to the store, and there they helped me design my own system to suit my listening style. Two speakers or four? Turntable or tape player? Headphones? The stereo store catered to my taste, my music, my needs – and I ended up with a system that was perfect for me. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

ICD-10-CM: Have you mapped out your transition plan?

coding_setsEven if you’ve worked in healthcare only a short time, you’ve probably noticed that many providers are overwhelmed by the idea of ICD-10-CM and may not know quite where to start. In addition, transition to these new diagnosis code sets has been pending for so long that healthcare professionals aren’t convinced these deadlines are “really real.” The common quip for years now: “I’ll be retired before it happens!”

But the truth is that you already lag behind suggested timelines if you haven’t begun mapping out your transition plan.

The Oct. 1, 2013, implementation date seems a long way off. But you can expect the compliance deadline to hold firm; many of the current administration’s new value-based purchasing initiatives depend on the level of detail available in ICD-10 codes. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

SwipeIT: Standardized insurance ID cards considered for reliable data capture

insurance_checkinWhen it comes to the healthcare reform debate, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and its push toward electronic medical records (EMRs) captures the lion’s share of the media spotlight. Somewhat lost in all the talk about EMR incentives, however, is a completely separate effort that’s underway to improve data capture and cut costs.

A project spearheaded by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) called SwipeIT brings the concept of machine-readable standardized patient insurance ID cards to healthcare. Think of your debit card. If this concept works for the banking industry, why not healthcare?

Non-standardized paper health insurance ID cards currently cost the industry as much as $2.2 billion annually, MGMA estimates. The association calculates that the labor-intensive, error-riddled process of manually obtaining patient demographic and insurance information from inconsistent paper ID cards may cause as many as 10%-25% of rejected claims.  Today, many patient check-in kiosk solutions read magnetic insurance swipe cards provided by insurance carriers. However, not all of these institutions provide such cards. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

4 Comments

The times they are a’changing

emr_practice_managementThere is no way Bob Dylan could have been thinking about HIT when he released his 1964 album predicting a new vision for America. Yet his words seem remarkably appropriate as healthcare leaders from coast to coast wonder how best to prepare themselves for the game-changing technology initiatives that loom on the horizon.

The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in February 2009 created unprecedented interest in electronic medical records – and with good reason. The legislation promises incentives for providers implementing an EMR system within the next few years and penalties against slow adopters shortly thereafter. Physicians have naturally begun worrying about how to select the “right” system – and how they would pay for it. HIT vendors added to the frenzy by intensifying marketing efforts in order to grab a piece of the EMR pie sooner rather than later.

But amidst the noise and confusion of early reactions to the ARRA, both healthcare and technology leaders may have overlooked the overarching objective behind the push for EMRs: To increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the healthcare system. This is an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes while reducing cost to all stakeholders, including patients. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , ,

No Comments